It is very much a work in progress. I may not be telling you something you don't already know, but in reading this comment what hit me was that you've definitely got a different definition of "conjugality" going on here. They would be, if humans were the ones doing them.
It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were cast into the sea than that he should cause one of these little ones to sin. Then her husband arose and went after her, to speak kindly to her and bring her back. The tongue of the wise commends knowledge, but the mouths of fools pour out folly.
O foolish Galatians! The image of woman and man is reflected in Genesis as God made the union between male and female. But if any man thinks that he is acting unbecomingly toward his virgin daughter, if she is past her youth, and if it must be so, let him do what he wishes, he does not sin; let her marry.
Catholics showed little interest 30 percent in further learning of marriage teaching, with CARA noting "perhaps because they are already relatively familiar with Church teaching on marriage. Personally, I hope it does sever those ties Support for same-sex marriage also has remained steady among whites, blacks and Hispanics over the past two years.
I already know gay sex can be a good thing.
If by conjugal, you mean people who, generally, will be having sex, I agree that is part of it. At least that's how I would handle it, were I a priest. Close out your savings accounts, ye sinners! The Bible. Maybe you need to consider this in its historical context, and that careful consideration leads to a reinterpretation, where gay sex was never condemned.
Regarding the death penalty, Justinian's legal novels heralded a change in the Roman legal paradigm by introducing the concept of not divine punishment for homosexual behavior.