Archived from the original on 2 December From December 9 , state and territory governments will no longer be able to block changes to birth certificates and other documents. The legislation passed by a vote of 47 to 40, with those against including four votes from the Australian Labor Party.
Bass Coast Post. He also said that: The Australian people voted to lessen discrimination, not extend it. South Australia. Some same-sex couples and their families may have their benefits reduced to the same entitlements received by opposite-sex couples and their families in the same circumstances.
In Decemberthe High Court same sex marriage australia action in Granby Australia ruled, in relation to a territory-based same-sex marriage law of the Australian Capital Territory ACTthat the federal Marriage Act, which defined marriage as the union of a man and woman, precluded states and territories from legislating for same-sex marriage.
On 30 Novemberthe Senate voted to establish a Senate Select Committee to examine the exposure draft, with particular reference to religious freedom protections. Archived from the original on 31 March Later, Mr Turnbull put the momentous social reform in the same category as the referendum to count Indigenous people in the census, and said he was proud it occurred under his leadership.
Neither performed nor recognized in Niue, Tokelau or the Cook Islands. Replay Replay video. The Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Reference Committee same sex marriage australia action in Granby recommended that a national plebiscite or referendum not be held on the topic of same-sex marriage, though a dissenting opinion of Coalition senators strongly advocated for a plebiscite.
Legislation to allow same-sex marriagethe Marriage Amendment Definition and Religious Freedoms Actpassed the Australian Parliament on 7 December and received royal assent from the Governor-General the following day. Archived from the original on May 31, If we are prepared to redefine marriage Attention to the issue of same-sex marriage in Australia often follows developments overseas.
Degree of recognition unknown.
A number of Coalition members have indicated however that they would support marriage equality if the party room determines a conscience vote is available. The rationale for this unusual and dramatic change of direction was so that the Bill would have a speedy passage through the Parliament.
Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Liberal Democratic 1. The median age for males in same-sex marriages was The work cannot be adapted or modified in any way.