Sex offender recidivism prediction. Psychological Assessment, 15 3 Fleiss, J. For the other sex offender risk scales, the average d value was.
Police smash one of Australia's biggest child sex rings. Prevalence, prediction and perseveration of sexual reoffending in a sample identified through court records. Nevertheless, the findings were remarkably consistent.
Developmental risk factors for sexual offending. Further research is needed to identify the most important treatment targets for sexual offenders. Nicholaichuk, J. Barnes, November 17, ; J.
In 2 facebook christchurch sex offenders in Ottawa, recidivism was assessed solely from self-reports, and in 6 studies the recidivism criteria was unknown. Although at one time there was widespread scepticism concerning the effectiveness of any correctional program Martinson,much is now known about the interventions that are likely to reduce the recidivism rates of general offenders.
Studies where the index offence was not a sexual offence were excluded, even if some of the subjects had committed a sexual offence in the past. Gretton, G.
The current study focussed on mixed groups of sexual offenders, and there was no effort to identify distinct predictors for specific subgroups e. Sexual preoccupation, on the other hand, was a significant d. The Revised Psychopathy Checklist: Reliability and factor structure. The lowest accuracy was found for clinical assessments d.
Each approach asks slightly different questions and neither approach has won universal acceptance Whitehead, , section 6. Further analyses are required to determine whether the variability in the predictive accuracy of the measures is more than would be expected by chance.